Discussion:
Donald Trump Is Now Officially Felon-in-Chief
Add Reply
b***@panix.com
2025-01-10 15:21:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.

--bks
Skeeter
2025-01-10 15:31:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
No jail, no probation and he's your president. LOL
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-10 19:03:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
No jail, no probation and he's your president. LOL
Our first Convicted Felon president.

Who preaches "tough on crime".

Gads......................
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:04:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
No jail, no probation and he's your president. LOL
Our first Convicted Felon president.
Who preaches "tough on crime".
Gads......................
You know the whole thing is bullshit. Guess what? He's your president.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-11 02:57:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
No jail, no probation and he's your president. LOL
Our first Convicted Felon president.
Who preaches "tough on crime".
Gads......................
You know the whole thing is bullshit. Guess what? He's your president.
Trump is a convicted felon.

Fact.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 11:20:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
No jail, no probation and he's your president. LOL
Our first Convicted Felon president.
Who preaches "tough on crime".
Gads......................
You know the whole thing is bullshit. Guess what? He's your president.
Trump is a convicted felon.
Fact.
Soon to be appealed and gone away.
Chris Ahlstrom
2025-01-10 16:48:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.

The following will be the first lie of his second term:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I
take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of
evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the
office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
--
Are the STEWED PRUNES still in the HAIR DRYER?
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-10 19:05:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
to enter: So help me God."
At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:05:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
to enter: So help me God."
At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Cry a river. Is that the best you can do?
NoBody
2025-01-11 15:22:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:05:17 -0700, Skeeter
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
to enter: So help me God."
At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Cry a river. Is that the best you can do?
It is and that what makes this so fun.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:14:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:05:17 -0700, Skeeter
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
to enter: So help me God."
At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Cry a river. Is that the best you can do?
It is and that what makes this so fun.
What a zero comment that was! Why do you spend so much time sucking off your
fellow right-wingnuts?
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Horseshit #000-001. Horseshit. Bullshit. Shit. @
'I desire torrid wild-eyed bungholery.' /|\
I'm saving up to buy a big zucchini to This post / \
shove 30cm up my growler! insults basic decency.
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-11 21:33:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:05:17 -0700, Skeeter
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
     "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
     the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign
     and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
     same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
     reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
     faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
     to enter: So help me God."
     At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Cry a river. Is that the best you can do?
It is and that what makes this so fun.
What a zero comment that was! Why do you spend so much time sucking off
your fellow right-wingnuts?
I make no such distinction at the jolly kone, all wellcum.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 22:26:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <abBgP.940643$***@fx17.iad>, ***@comcast.net
says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:05:17 -0700, Skeeter
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about
to enter: So help me God."
At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Cry a river. Is that the best you can do?
It is and that what makes this so fun.
What a zero comment that was! Why do you spend so much time sucking off your
fellow right-wingnuts?
It was enough to get you to howl.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-12 02:48:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:05:17 -0700, Skeeter
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all
enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith
and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation
freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;
and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of
the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
At least Trump cannot rail against
vote-by-mail while voting by mail himself
anymore.
Cry a river. Is that the best you can do?
It is and that what makes this so fun.
What a zero comment that was! Why do you spend so much time sucking
off your fellow right-wingnuts?
It is on par with his "Trump is
rich so he is right" blather.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:04:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
Can't wait to reset the Trump Lie Count to 0.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I
take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of
evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the
office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
He so owns you.
Adrian Dittman
2025-01-10 21:28:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
Fat racist Steve Bannon said today that all black children want to grow up
to be felons like Trump.
186282@ud0s4.net
2025-01-11 01:02:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Who cares ?

He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 01:56:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
super70s
2025-01-11 04:41:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.

He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 11:20:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vlssp4$fnng$***@dont-email.me>, ***@super70s.invalid
says...
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
It will be tossed and then you can cry some more.
Chris Ahlstrom
2025-01-11 12:07:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.

He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
--
Life is a healthy respect for mother nature laced with greed.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 13:32:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
pothead
2025-01-11 17:13:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.

Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Easily.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 17:58:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Easily.
Define "easily."
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:18:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Easily.
Define "easily."
idjt promises to loan Thomas an aircraft carrier for water skiing
at Bali.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-11 19:01:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?

Esp a trial ended with no fine, no
prison time, no probation, just a "go and
sin no more" pat on the back.
Blue Lives Matter
2025-01-11 20:03:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Esp a trial ended with no fine, no
prison time, no probation, just a "go and
sin no more" pat on the back.
Having a fair trial is well covered in the Constitution, dummy.
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:47:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 15:03:38 -0500, Blue Lives Matter
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Esp a trial ended with no fine, no
prison time, no probation, just a "go and
sin no more" pat on the back.
Having a fair trial is well covered in the Constitution, dummy.
Nothing like having a trial that required a second crime for a guilty
verdict and the jurors being given a Chinese menu to select from.
Evidence of guilt of those crimes not required.

Liberals definition of "fair".
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 20:51:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
pothead
2025-01-11 21:20:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another prosecutor on the case.

This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a felony for a book keeping error.
He is well known for being soft on crime and lowering offenses from felonies to misdemeanors.
Then of course there is the specific underlying crime which "permitted" him to do that.

Trump was unfairly prosecuted because he is Trump.
Others doing the same and worse pay a fine and move on.
Not a felony.
Love Trump or hate him, the people/voters realized the lawfare going on and voted accordingly.
If anything, the democrat's attempt to silence Trump helped him win.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:51:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another prosecutor on the case.
What denial? He got a trial, did he not? Cannon does not act a
prosecutor; her role is a dry sock when idjt tries to pleasure
himself.
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a felony for a book keeping error.
It is called prosecutorial discretion. Because of separation of
powers. You have to go to New York voters and convince them.
Post by pothead
He is well known for being soft on crime and lowering offenses from felonies to misdemeanors.
Then of course there is the specific underlying crime which "permitted" him to do that.
That is up to voters.
Post by pothead
Trump was unfairly prosecuted because he is Trump.
That was the argument Gotti used for his successful appeal and
avoiding prison.
Post by pothead
Others doing the same and worse pay a fine and move on.
Not a felony.
A jury is the conscience of the community and can refuse to
convict on DA abuse.
Post by pothead
Love Trump or hate him, the people/voters realized the lawfare going on and voted accordingly.
America was still great when you knew you would face no penalty
for lynching blacks.
Post by pothead
If anything, the democrat's attempt to silence Trump helped him win.
Too bad to fail.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 21:52:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another prosecutor on the case.
That is not a serious argument.
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved covering up
illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an affair. So sure,
it was politically motivated. But, it was legally sound and not needed
had the Senate done what they should have done: convicted and
disqualified Trump.
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-11 22:04:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
       Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another prosecutor
on the case.
That is not a serious argument.
It's worse than that. It is completely partisan and delusional bullshit.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a felony
for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved covering up illegal
campaign contributions. This one covered up an affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were made in
order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not the underlying crime
for which Bragg elevated the charges from misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying
about this.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 23:11:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
       Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another
prosecutor on the case.
That is not a serious argument.
It's worse than that. It is completely partisan and delusional bullshit.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a
felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved covering
up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were
made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not the
underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from misdemeanors
to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-11 23:18:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
       Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another
prosecutor on the case.
That is not a serious argument.
It's worse than that. It is completely partisan and delusional bullshit.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a felony
for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved covering up
illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were made in
order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not the underlying
crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from misdemeanors to felonies. Stop
lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was prosecuted for
covering up an affair. You have nothing to support that. Bragg expressly stated
the potential crimes Trump was trying to conceal, and an affair — which isn't a
crime — was not listed. Paying hush money also wasn't listed.

Cut the shit.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 23:50:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to
a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an
affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were
made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not
the underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from
misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was prosecuted
for covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know
the difference between an opinion and fact.
pothead
2025-01-11 23:54:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to
a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an
affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were
made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not
the underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from
misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was prosecuted
for covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know
the difference between an opinion and fact.
Maybe, but many immigrants know full well what socialism, communism and overly
controlling governments mean for the citizens.
And that is the last thing they want to experience here in the USA hence them
supporting republicans.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Siri Cruise
2025-01-12 00:12:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Maybe, but many immigrants know full well what socialism, communism and overly
controlling governments mean for the citizens.
And that is the last thing they want to experience here in the USA hence them
supporting republicans.
The Time Meddler made it to youtube.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-12 02:45:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor
to a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up
an affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions
were made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair
was not the underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges
from misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was
prosecuted for covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know
the difference between an opinion and fact.
Maybe, but many immigrants know full well what socialism, communism
and overly controlling governments mean for the citizens.
So immigrants are both fleeing socialism
AND trying to impose socialism?

"We’re going to keep foreign, Christian-
hating communists, Marxists and socialists
out of America."
Donald Trump, June 26 2023

You are making no sense at all.
pothead
2025-01-12 14:51:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor
to a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up
an affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions
were made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair
was not the underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges
from misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was
prosecuted for covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know
the difference between an opinion and fact.
Maybe, but many immigrants know full well what socialism, communism
and overly controlling governments mean for the citizens.
So immigrants are both fleeing socialism
AND trying to impose socialism?
"We’re going to keep foreign, Christian-
hating communists, Marxists and socialists
out of America."
Donald Trump, June 26 2023
You are making no sense at all.
The people who honestly are coming here to better their lives have
no use for socialism. they want to work and build their businesses

The others, the lazy ones, criminals,potential terrorists and so forth
want to take everything they can from the government.

Tour any ethnic neighborhood in NYC and you will see the former.
Walk near the 4 star hotels on Broadway and you will see examples of the latter.

Another example is the Cuban and Hispanic neighborhoods in Florida where
those people have no use for socialism which is why they supported Trump.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-12 00:05:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a
felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved covering up
illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were made
in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not the underlying
crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from misdemeanors to felonies.
Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was prosecuted for
covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know the
difference between an opinion and fact.
We need immigrants who know how to state clearly that they're offering an
opinion rather than a fact. You stated something as a fact.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-12 00:28:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor
to a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an
affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions
were made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was
not the underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from
misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was prosecuted
for covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know
the difference between an opinion and fact.
We need immigrants who know how to state clearly that they're offering
an opinion rather than a fact. You stated something as a fact.
You are stupid.

I didn't say so clearly, so was that a statement of fact or opinion?
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:51:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 15:50:37 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to
a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an
affair.
That's false. The books-cooking *was* to cover up illegal campaign
contributions, for which Cohen went to prison. The contributions were
made in order to try to cover up an affair, but the affair was not
the underlying crime for which Bragg elevated the charges from
misdemeanors to felonies. Stop lying about this.
It's an opinion about Bragg's motives and thus cannot be a lie.
It's not an opinion. You're stating as fact that Trump was prosecuted
for covering up an affair.
FFS. We need more immigrants because Americans are too stupid to know
the difference between an opinion and fact.
Are you claiming that the immigrants crossing the borders and being
dumped in our cities are well educated???

Laughter.

Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 23:48:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor
to a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved
covering up illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an
affair. So sure, it was politically motivated. But, it was legally
sound and not needed had the Senate done what they should have
done: convicted and disqualified Trump.
If the law is bad, go to the legislature to amend it. DA can use
whatever the law is even if it requires preteen girls to go
through childbirth.

The jury was the final check on the Bragg. They could have refused
to convict if they felt the trial was abusive.

They convicted.

If the voters of the city dislike what he did, they can oust him.
Bragg has to answer questions, just not from Felon in Chief.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:49:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:52:58 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some evidence
should not have been presented in conflict with the previous SCOTUS
immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another prosecutor on the case.
That is not a serious argument.
Obvious bias is not grounds for appeal???
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a felony for a book keeping error.
It's not at all a unique case. However, other cases involved covering up
illegal campaign contributions. This one covered up an affair. So sure,
it was politically motivated. But, it was legally sound and not needed
had the Senate done what they should have done: convicted and
disqualified Trump.
Cite for us another case that matched the parameters of this one.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-12 02:37:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to
focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some
evidence should not have been presented in conflict with the previous
SCOTUS immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another prosecutor on the case.
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a
felony for a book keeping error. He is well known for being soft on
crime and lowering offenses from felonies to misdemeanors. Then of
course there is the specific underlying crime which "permitted" him to
do that.
Trump was unfairly prosecuted because he is Trump.
Trump was unfairly SENTENCED because he is Trump.

Name any other defendant convicted of a felony
offense who walked out of court with no jail, no
prison, no fine and no probation.

Just one, any one.
Post by pothead
Others doing the same and worse pay a fine and move on.
Not a felony.
Bingo. ALL others convicted of ANYTHING
have *some* punishment.

But not Trump.
pothead
2025-01-12 02:50:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to
focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some
evidence should not have been presented in conflict with the previous
SCOTUS immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another
prosecutor on the case.
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a
felony for a book keeping error. He is well known for being soft on
crime and lowering offenses from felonies to misdemeanors. Then of
course there is the specific underlying crime which "permitted" him to
do that.
Trump was unfairly prosecuted because he is Trump.
Name another defendent who got felony convictions for
paperwork errors.
Most pay a fine and move on,.

And then of course there is Bragg turning down the charges until
one of Biden's shills who BTW gave up a 3rd from the top of the DOJ position
to become an ADA.

Open your eyes.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Trump was unfairly SENTENCED because he is Trump.
They have nothing on him other than a jury who was biased
due to evidence that never should have been presented coupled with
the judge's highly biased instructions.

Again wake up.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Name any other defendant convicted of a felony
offense who walked out of court with no jail, no
prison, no fine and no probation.
You prove my points.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Just one, any one.
See above.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Others doing the same and worse pay a fine and move on.
Not a felony.
Bingo. ALL others convicted of ANYTHING
have *some* punishment.
But not Trump.
That's the point.
If this is really a serious case why no punishment?
That's my point.

It's not a serious case and all they were looking for was to slow down Trump
and label him a felon.
The libbys failed on point one and they will fail on point 2.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Skeeter
2025-01-11 22:20:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus
on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Esp a trial ended with no fine, no
prison time, no probation, just a "go and
sin no more" pat on the back.
The judge knew that was all he could do.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:14:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.
Why focus on one? Why not appeal on all the 'shams'?
Post by pothead
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Easily.
Ce qui sera sera. Do not count you eggs until the incubator breaks
and Miss Gulch seizes your farm.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Alan
2025-01-11 21:22:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
No. He'll lose because the judge committed no reversible error, nor was there
any misconduct by the prosecution. Trump would have to allege incompetent
representation by his own lawyers, and that's just not going to fly.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 22:28:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <XiBgP.104567$***@fx06.iad>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
No. He'll lose because the judge committed no reversible error, nor was there
any misconduct by the prosecution. Trump would have to allege incompetent
representation by his own lawyers, and that's just not going to fly.
Watch and cry.
pothead
2025-01-11 23:00:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the toughest decision
Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are far left leaning
No. He'll lose because the judge committed no reversible error, nor was there
any misconduct by the prosecution. Trump would have to allege incompetent
representation by his own lawyers, and that's just not going to fly.
Watch and cry.
Yep.
The libbys heads are spinning like tops.
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 23:11:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-11 23:21:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will
have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
Forget it. "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the least bit
masculine, doesn't have any, because no one on CNN said that.

Many legal experts originally thought that Bragg's case was weak. Most
eventually changed their minds on that. "pothole," chromosomally and
anatomically male but not the least bit masculine, may feel that the *case* was
dodgy, but the trial itself absolutely was *not* a "sham." It was conducted
impeccably and entirely according to law.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 23:30:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <j2DgP.381931$***@fx09.iad>, ***@phil.hendrie.con
says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will
have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
Forget it. "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the least bit
masculine, doesn't have any, because no one on CNN said that.
Many legal experts originally thought that Bragg's case was weak. Most
eventually changed their minds on that. "pothole," chromosomally and
anatomically male but not the least bit masculine, may feel that the *case* was
dodgy, but the trial itself absolutely was *not* a "sham." It was conducted
impeccably and entirely according to law.
Who's law?
pothead
2025-01-11 23:45:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials, but here is CNN admitting Jack Smith's lawfare.

<https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-10-04-1715/politics-even-cnn-admits-jack-smith-s-latest-lawfare-just-straight-election>
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 23:59:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials, but here is CNN admitting Jack Smith's lawfare.
<https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-10-04-1715/politics-even-cnn-admits-jack-smith-s-latest-lawfare-just-straight-election>
The criticism was about process norms, not the merits of the case.
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-12 00:15:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump
will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials, but here is CNN admitting Jack Smith's lawfare.
*HA HA HA HA HA*! "Lawfare" — that is, fascist right-wingnuts' imaginary belief
that the cases against Trump were "politically motivated." They were not. The
indictments were legally airtight.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
<https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-10-04-1715/politics-even-cnn-admits-jack-
smith-s-latest-lawfare-just-straight-election>
The criticism was about process norms, not the merits of the case.
For fuck's sake. That piece was by an ultra-right-wingnut named William Upton,
and was published at the neo-Nazi site "National Pulse"; "AllSides" merely
aggregated it. Upton repeats this vomit-inducing lie about "lawfare." When you
see tells like that, you need to stop reading and disregard the entire thing.
Everything Upton says about Smith is bullshit.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-12 00:31:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 1/11/2025 3:45 PM, "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male
Post by pothead
On 1/11/2025 3:00 PM, "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male
but not the least bit masculine, and who is deathly afraid of Rudy,
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and
Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials, but here is CNN admitting Jack Smith's lawfare.
*HA HA HA HA HA*! "Lawfare" — that is, fascist right-wingnuts' imaginary
belief that the cases against Trump were "politically motivated." They
were not. The indictments were legally airtight.
Post by pothead
<https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-10-04-1715/politics-even-cnn-
admits-jack- smith-s-latest-lawfare-just-straight-election>
The criticism was about process norms, not the merits of the case.
For fuck's sake. That piece was by an ultra-right-wingnut named William
Upton, and was published at the neo-Nazi site "National Pulse";
"AllSides" merely aggregated it. Upton repeats this vomit-inducing lie
about "lawfare." When you see tells like that, you need to stop reading
and disregard the entire thing. Everything Upton says about Smith is
bullshit.
The AllSides article linked to Honig's criticism.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/jack-smith-s-october-surprise/ar-AA1rDZyw
Siri Cruise
2025-01-12 00:16:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials, but here is CNN admitting Jack Smith's lawfare.
<https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-10-04-1715/politics-even-cnn-admits-jack-smith-s-latest-lawfare-just-straight-election>


This is the reason CNN's Crossfire is no longer on the air. Jon
Stewart shows up these two ignorant political show hosts... 2
against 1, on their own show, and brings to light how these shows
"Hurt America." Thank you Jon for always pointing out political
hypocrisy. I hope continuing to broadcast this video helps your
voice continue to be heard.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-12 00:19:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials,
No, you fucking liar. There was only *one* criminal trial of the convicted felon
Trump. There was nothing with which to mix it up.

*No* "legal experts on CNN" said that the New York State trial against Trump was
a "sham." Some experts think the case was not very good, but the *trial* was
impeccable. A jury found Trump guilty of felonies. Trump is going to *lose* his
appeals in New York State courts.
Skeeter
2025-01-12 02:11:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials,
No, you fucking liar. There was only *one* criminal trial of the convicted felon
Trump. There was nothing with which to mix it up.
*No* "legal experts on CNN" said that the New York State trial against Trump was
a "sham." Some experts think the case was not very good, but the *trial* was
impeccable. A jury found Trump guilty of felonies. Trump is going to *lose* his
appeals in New York State courts.
Like he cares. He's the president. I guess there is no punishment.
Moving along.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-12 02:32:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by AlleyCat
Post by pothead
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials,
No, you fucking liar. There was only *one* criminal trial of the convicted felon
Trump. There was nothing with which to mix it up.
*No* "legal experts on CNN" said that the New York State trial against Trump was
a "sham." Some experts think the case was not very good, but the *trial* was
impeccable. A jury found Trump guilty of felonies. Trump is going to *lose* his
appeals in New York State courts.
Like he cares. He's the president. I guess there is no punishment.
Moving along.
Trump cares. He can't move along.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 23:40:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
I do not watch CNN.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
pothead
2025-01-11 23:50:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
I do not watch CNN.
Good for you.
Maybe there is hope.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 15:53:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 16:33:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
He won. Now you can cry for us.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 17:57:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
He won. Now you can cry for us.
He lost the NY court case.

But, he can't stand winning either (the election) as evidenced by his
lawsuit against Ann Selzer.

It's all about his grievances, all the time (just like a baby).
Skeeter
2025-01-11 19:02:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Skeeter
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
He won. Now you can cry for us.
He lost the NY court case.
Appealed soon and we will laugh.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, he can't stand winning either (the election) as evidenced by his
lawsuit against Ann Selzer.
Cry a river.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
It's all about his grievances, all the time (just like a baby).
He won, you lost. We dance, you cry.
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:44:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:02:52 -0700, Skeeter
Post by Skeeter
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Skeeter
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
He won. Now you can cry for us.
He lost the NY court case.
Appealed soon and we will laugh.
And Josh will disappear and sulk as he does when he loses.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, he can't stand winning either (the election) as evidenced by his
lawsuit against Ann Selzer.
Cry a river.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
It's all about his grievances, all the time (just like a baby).
He won, you lost. We dance, you cry.
Sums it up quite nicely.
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:43:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 09:57:46 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Skeeter
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
He won. Now you can cry for us.
He lost the NY court case.
But, he can't stand winning either (the election) as evidenced by his
lawsuit against Ann Selzer.
Interesting attempt at a tie in.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
It's all about his grievances, all the time (just like a baby).
You mean like the Biden government being permittted to go after
parents?

I think I prefer Trump's approach to things you had no objection
about.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:06:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't
stand losing.
We have a man-baby present who still denies he is convicted felon.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
pothead
2025-01-11 21:25:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't
stand losing.
We have a man-baby present who still denies he is convicted felon.
Actually currently we have a senile, demented president, Joe Biden who is unable to
read a telephone number off a cheat sheet.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Skeeter
2025-01-11 22:24:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vlumh1$pfth$***@dont-email.me>, ***@www.yahoo.com
says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't
stand losing.
Like the tears from you libtards.
Post by Siri Cruise
We have a man-baby present who still denies he is convicted felon.
It will be appealed and we will laugh at you.
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:45:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:06:40 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't
stand losing.
We have a man-baby present who still denies he is convicted felon.
Laughter.....

If that hollow victory keeps you warm at night.
Bradley K. Sherman
2025-01-12 14:48:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
|
| Can Trump Travel As President? Here's Where His Convicted
| Felon Status Could Be A Problem.
| ...
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2025/01/10/can-trump-travel-as-president-heres-where-his-convicted-felon-status-could-be-a-problem/>

--bks
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:41:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:53:00 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on appeal,
which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate dealer...
"any publicity is good publicity".
That's part of it. The other part is he is a man-baby who can't stand
losing.
Oh the irony....

Laughter.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:20:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by super70s
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
It will be fun when the injustices order a retrial.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
186282@ud0s4.net
2025-01-11 07:37:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.

So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.

Also, the stench of 'lawfare' became very obvious
even to Regular Joes ... expect few sympathies for
this bogus case.

Meanwhile, at this point, what I said - "WHO CARES ?"

The Wokie party is OVER.

About fuckin' TIME !
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 15:52:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
  Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
  So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
pardoned for this crime.

(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
sure which way).
J Carlson
2025-01-11 21:19:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be pardoned for
this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule 5-4 with
Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not sure which way).
It is virtually inconceivable that an appeal would be taken up by the SCOTUS.
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to be on things
like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having given wrong jury
instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's just not going to be able to
find a federal issue, e.g., he was arrested without probable cause, or there was
an illegal search undertaken. No federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 21:54:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will
rule 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other -
I'm not sure which way).
It is virtually inconceivable that an appeal would be taken up by the SCOTUS.
There were 4 votes to let the appeals process go forward right now.
Those justices will vote grant cert (it takes 4 to do so).
Post by J Carlson
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to
be on things like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having
given wrong jury instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's just
not going to be able to find a federal issue, e.g., he was arrested
without probable cause, or there was an illegal search undertaken. No
federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
As I posed elsewhere, they have already raised a federal issue: the
inclusion of evidence precluded by Trump v. United States.
J Carlson
2025-01-11 22:05:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be pardoned for
this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule 5-4
with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not sure
which way).
It is virtually inconceivable that an appeal would be taken up by the SCOTUS.
There were 4 votes to let the appeals process go forward right now. Those
justices will vote grant cert (it takes 4 to do so).
Different appeal. Trump was seeking to halt his sentencing.
Post by J Carlson
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to be on things
like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having given wrong jury
instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's just not going to be able to
find a federal issue, e.g., he was arrested without probable cause, or there
was an illegal search undertaken. No federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
As I posed elsewhere, they have already raised a federal issue: the inclusion of
evidence precluded by Trump v. United States.
There was none.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 23:10:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will
rule 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other
- I'm not sure which way).
It is virtually inconceivable that an appeal would be taken up by the SCOTUS.
There were 4 votes to let the appeals process go forward right now.
Those justices will vote grant cert (it takes 4 to do so).
Different appeal. Trump was seeking to halt his sentencing.
It's enough to know where they stand.
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to be
on things like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having
given wrong jury instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's
just not going to be able to find a federal issue, e.g., he was
arrested without probable cause, or there was an illegal search
undertaken. No federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
As I posed elsewhere, they have already raised a federal issue: the
inclusion of evidence precluded by Trump v. United States.
There was none.
You aren't a SCOTUS justice.
J Carlson
2025-01-11 23:16:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be pardoned
for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule 5-4
with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not sure
which way).
It is virtually inconceivable that an appeal would be taken up by the SCOTUS.
There were 4 votes to let the appeals process go forward right now. Those
justices will vote grant cert (it takes 4 to do so).
Different appeal. Trump was seeking to halt his sentencing.
It's enough to know where they stand.
Post by J Carlson
Post by J Carlson
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to be on
things like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having given wrong
jury instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's just not going to be
able to find a federal issue, e.g., he was arrested without probable cause,
or there was an illegal search undertaken. No federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
As I posed elsewhere, they have already raised a federal issue: the inclusion
of evidence precluded by Trump v. United States.
There was none.
You aren't a SCOTUS justice.
You certainly aren't. You've been asked before to state just what presidential
duty Trump was performing when he ordered his books to be falsified, and you
whiffed off.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-11 23:50:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to be
on things like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having
given wrong jury instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's
just not going to be able to find a federal issue, e.g., he was
arrested without probable cause, or there was an illegal search
undertaken. No federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
As I posed elsewhere, they have already raised a federal issue: the
inclusion of evidence precluded by Trump v. United States.
There was none.
You aren't a SCOTUS justice.
You certainly aren't. You've been asked before to state just what
presidential duty Trump was performing when he ordered his books to be
falsified, and you whiffed off.
That's not the argument. To the contrary, Trump conceded his books
aren't a presidential duty.

The argument is testimony in the trial included official duties that
aren't permissible as evidence under Trump v. United States. One example
put forth by Trump is the testimony of Hope Hicks in her communications
with Trump. Trump may or may not prevail on that argument. But, it is a
federal issue.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 23:50:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
Different appeal. Trump was seeking to halt his sentencing.
It's enough to know where they stand.
Knee deep in corruption.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:39:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:54:52 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will
rule 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other -
I'm not sure which way).
It is virtually inconceivable that an appeal would be taken up by the SCOTUS.
There were 4 votes to let the appeals process go forward right now.
Those justices will vote grant cert (it takes 4 to do so).
There is likely 100 different state appealable issues with this trial.
I'm not sure the federal route would be necessary but it would likely
be quicker given how corrupt the NY courts have been.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by J Carlson
All of Trump's appeals in NY state appellate courts are going to
be on things like Merchan having got NY *state* law wrong, or having
given wrong jury instructions, again based on NY *state* law. He's just
not going to be able to find a federal issue, e.g., he was arrested
without probable cause, or there was an illegal search undertaken. No
federal issue = no SCOTUS cert
As I posed elsewhere, they have already raised a federal issue: the
inclusion of evidence precluded by Trump v. United States.
NoBody
2025-01-12 14:34:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
  Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
  So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
sure which way).
He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce, and a pardon
wouldn't be necessary. I'll hold you to your laughable prediction.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 21:54:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
  Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
Like Newsom?
  Meanwhile, at this point, what I said - "WHO CARES ?"
Residents of Los Angeles.
  The Wokie party is OVER.
  About fuckin' TIME !
Make way for California law suits.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-11 15:22:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:56:18 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
But it WILL be overturned so this victory is hollow.
Lucas McCain
2025-01-11 21:15:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:56:18 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
But it WILL be overturned
Highly unlikely.
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-11 21:31:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lucas McCain
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:56:18 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
But it WILL be overturned
Highly unlikely.
Are you the Rifleman?
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 23:53:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Lucas McCain
Post by NoBody
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:56:18 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
But it WILL be overturned
Highly unlikely.
Are you the Rifleman?
Who's that riding in the sun?
Who's the man with the itchy gun?
Who's the man who kills for fun?
Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad.

He sleeps with a gun
but he loves his son
Killed his wife 'cos she weighed a ton.
Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad.

A little touched or so we're told
Killed his wife 'cos she had a cold
Might as well she was gettin' old
Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad.

He's quick with a gun
And his job ain't done.
Killed his wife by twenty-one,
Psycho Dad!

Who's that riding in the sleigh?
Who's that firing along the way?
Who's roughing up bums on Christmas day?
Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad

Who's the tall, dark stranger there.
The one with the gun and the icy stare.
The one with the scalp of his ex-wife's hair!
Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad!

Who's that riding across the plain?
Who's lost count of the wives he's slain?
Who's the man who's plumb insane?
Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad, Psycho Dad

He's a durn good pa, but he hates the law.
He's likes to eat it raw, He's Psycho Dad!
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Rudy Canoza
2025-01-11 20:57:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
That wouldn't stop Trump from attempting it.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 22:23:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <iXAgP.719253$***@fx15.iad>, ***@phil.hendrie.con
says...
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
That wouldn't stop Trump from attempting it.
Run along commie pig.
NoBody
2025-01-11 15:20:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
Enjoy your tiny, hollow victory while it lasts.
The case will be tossed on appeal and the left will go down in history
for the pathetic partisans they are.

As for the rest of us...we simply don't care about that silliness.
Alan
2025-01-11 21:07:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
Enjoy your tiny, hollow victory while it lasts.
The case will be tossed on appeal
No, it will not be. You clearly don't know anything about the appeals process,
nor about valid grounds for appeal.

An appeal has to be based on an allegation that the judge made reversible
errors. Such errors could be:

* inadmissible evidence was admitted
* admissible evidence was improperly excluded
* improper jury instructions
* improper charges brought by D.A.

Trump doesn't have a case on any of those.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 22:25:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <s4BgP.409296$***@fx11.iad>, ***@comcast.net
says...
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
Enjoy your tiny, hollow victory while it lasts.
The case will be tossed on appeal
No, it will not be. You clearly don't know anything about the appeals process,
nor about valid grounds for appeal.
An appeal has to be based on an allegation that the judge made reversible
* inadmissible evidence was admitted
* admissible evidence was improperly excluded
* improper jury instructions
* improper charges brought by D.A.
Trump doesn't have a case on any of those.
Watch and see. He will have the power to tug the right strings.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 23:55:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by b***@panix.com
When he starts talking about criminals the audience will
break out laughing.
--bks
Enjoy your tiny, hollow victory while it lasts.
The case will be tossed on appeal and the left will go down in history
for the pathetic partisans they are.
As for the rest of us...we simply don't care about that silliness.
Lead the trek to Alaska. Then you can conquer the living space in
Siberia.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Loading...