Discussion:
Trump Declares War On The First Amendment
Add Reply
Bradley K. Sherman
2024-12-12 22:46:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
|
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
|
| Trump 2.0 will feature more media subpoenas, communications
| seizures, whistleblower prosecutions, and legal threats
| against news outlets
| ...
<https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-war-press-media-leaks-1235202909/>

--bks
Skeeter
2024-12-12 23:14:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
|
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
|
| Trump 2.0 will feature more media subpoenas, communications
| seizures, whistleblower prosecutions, and legal threats
| against news outlets
| ...
<https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-war-press-media-leaks-1235202909/>
--bks
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Bradley K. Sherman
2024-12-12 23:18:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.

--bks

Either you're Antifa or you're Profa.
Skeeter
2024-12-12 23:29:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
--bks
Either you're Antifa or you're Profa.
You are so far out there I don't even know how to respond. I have never
owned a gun.
Bradley K. Sherman
2024-12-12 23:38:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
...
You are so far out there I don't even know how to respond. I have never
owned a gun.
I stand corrected: As far as Skeeter is concerned we can scrap
the entire Bill of Rights.

--bks
Skeeter
2024-12-12 23:44:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
...
You are so far out there I don't even know how to respond. I have never
owned a gun.
I stand corrected: As far as Skeeter is concerned we can scrap
the entire Bill of Rights.
--bks
Look what I made you do.
Karen Bass Deserted Los Angeles
2025-01-12 08:03:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
CLEVELAND, Ohio (WOIO) - A 48-year-old man will spend the rest of his life in prison for raping a total of six women.

Ronald Wheeler just pleaded guilty to raping two women in Cleveland in December 2006 and March 2007.

He was tied to those cold case crimes after the unsolved rape kits were sent by the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office to the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).

Loading Image...

Convicted of raping six women.((Source: Cuyahoga County Sheriff))
Wheeler, who is already serving a 48-year prison term for four other stranger rapes, was immediately sentenced to an additional 20 years in prison.

He will not be eligible for release until August 2075.

“This serial rapist, who has been convicted of raping six victims, will now rightfully die behind bars,” said Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Michael O’Malley. “Although delayed, justice has been served for these victims.”

On Dec. 18, 2006, Wheeler attacked an 18-year-old woman as she was walking near East 105th Street and Quincy Avenue.

He forced her into an empty building and sexually assaulted her multiple times at gunpoint.

On March 19, 2007, Wheeler grabbed a 23-year-old woman, who was holding her five-month-old infant, at a bus stop near Woodhill Road and Woodland Avenue.

He forced the woman and her baby at gunpoint to a vacant area by nearby train tracks and assaulted her multiple times, several times while holding her child.

https://www.cleveland19.com/2021/01/12/serial-rapist-pleads-guilty-raping-women-cleveland-total-victims/
Karen Bass Deserted Los Angeles
2025-01-12 08:36:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Loading Image...

(CLEVELAND)—Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine and Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy McGinty announced today that a suspected serial rapist has been indicted on charges linking him to the sexual assaults of seven women over a period of ten years.Jonas RhodesJonas Rhodes, 58, of Cleveland, is charged with 18 counts of rape and 12 counts of kidnapping in connection with the seven sexual assaults that occurred in the Cleveland area between 1993 and 2003.

The investigation began after forensic scientists with the Attorney General's Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) discovered identical DNA on seven rape kits submitted for testing by the Cleveland Police Department as part of Attorney General DeWine's Sexual Assault Kit Testing Initiative. Because the DNA profiles did not initially link to a known DNA standard in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), BCI agents working as part of Prosecutor McGinty's Sexual Assault Kit Task Force conducted additional investigation to identify Rhodes as the suspect.

Rhodes allegedly targeted women who were walking in Cleveland neighborhoods and, in several cases, he allegedly brandished either a gun or knife during the attacks.

"Our investigation shows that this defendant is a predator who allegedly attacked women over and over again whenever he saw an opportunity," said Attorney General DeWine. "With his arrest, we are working toward making sure that this alleged serial rapist will never have the chance to hurt anyone again," said Attorney General DeWine.

“Attorney General DeWine’s insistence that all the rape kits should be tested by BCI and then investigated has identified hundreds of serial rapists," said Prosecutor McGinty. "This is just another in a long series of indictments and arrests of habitual, dangerous offenders. Our Sexual Assault Kit Task Force has used DNA hits from BCI to solve more than 500 rapes. This defendant’s one-man rape spree is over. Mr. Rhodes will not be raping any more women.”

Before Rhodes was identified as the source of the DNA, Prosecutor McGinty indicted the DNA profile associated with the earliest cases, known at the time as "John Doe II." Those indictments ensured that the suspect, when identified, could be charged with the cases that had passed the statute of limitations.

Attorney General DeWine launched the SAK Testing Initiative in 2011 after learning that many law enforcement agencies across the state were in possession of rape kits, some of which were decades old, that had never been sent to a DNA lab for testing. Attorney General DeWine then made an open call to law enforcement to send their kits to BCI for DNA testing at no cost to them.

As of June 1, 2016, 11,000 of the 13,808 rape kits submitted for testing as part of the initiative have been analyzed. The testing has led to 3,968 hits in CODIS, linking crimes to offenders, identifying serial rapists, and giving law enforcement agencies critical evidence to help solve brutal attacks. In Cuyahoga County alone, hundreds of defendants have been indicted following DNA testing and follow-up investigations conducted as part of the effort.

Attorney General DeWine will join Prosecutor McGinty tomorrow to announce a separate case that is the 500th defendant indicted through the work of the Cuyahoga County Sexual Assault Kit Task Force.

-30-

Media Contacts:
Dan Tierny: 614-466-3840
Jill Del Greco: 614-466-3840
Cuyahoga County - Joe Frolik: 216-443-7488

https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Media/News-Releases/June-2016/Suspected-Serial-Rapist-Charged-with-Raping-Seven
Karen Bass Deserted Los Angeles
2025-01-13 07:01:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Loading Image...
Christopher Whitaker (Courtesy: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction)

The Supreme Court of Ohio today affirmed the death sentence of a Cleveland man who abducted and murdered a 14-year-old girl on her way to school.

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld two of three capital convictions of Christopher Whitaker based on the 2017 rape and kidnapping of the girl prior to killing her. The Court dismissed Whitaker’s conviction and death sentence based on aggravated burglary.

The Court was divided 6-1 on one aspect of Whitaker’s appeal, concerning the jury's inability to hear his offer to plead guilty in exchange for a sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Writing for the Court majority, Justice Patrick F. Fischer explained that Whitaker forcibly entered a vacant house with the victim, identified in court records as “A.D..,” and then raped, tortured, and murdered her with a power drill and other tools. Justice Fischer stated these “are horrific crimes” that support the imposition of the death penalty.

Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor and Justices Sharon L. Kennedy, R. Patrick DeWine, Michael P. Donnelly, and Melody Stewart joined Justice Fischer’s opinion.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Jennifer Brunner disagreed with the majority’s approval of the trial court's ruling to refuse allowing the jury to consider Whitaker’s offer to plead guilty as a mitigating factor. Justice Brunner wrote that while the jury should have been allowed to consider it, she agreed with the majority’s conclusion to affirm the death sentence.

https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2022/SCO/0818/191482.asp
Chris Ahlstrom
2024-12-13 12:11:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL

Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
--
I have a simple philosophy:

Fill what's empty. Empty what's full. Scratch where it itches.
-- A. R. Longworth
Ted
2024-12-13 13:19:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
Chris Ahlstrom
2024-12-13 13:40:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
I am the master of my domain!
--
Join the Navy; sail to far-off exotic lands, meet exciting interesting people,
and kill them.
Skeeter
2024-12-13 14:37:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
I am the master baiter of my domain!
FIFY
Siri Cruise
2024-12-13 20:05:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Ted
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
I am the master of my domain!
Bates Motel?
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
pothead
2024-12-13 14:23:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
Here is his pic.
https://images.app.goo.gl/FNkoxLPEmm5MMnRVA

Maybe the two of you can hook up on Tinder?

ROTFLMAO!
--
pothead

All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:

Example of Snit trolling in real time:

<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/biFilzgCcVg/m/eUcNGw6lP7UJ>

All about the snit troll:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
Siri Cruise
2024-12-13 20:06:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Ted
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
Here is his pic.
https://images.app.goo.gl/FNkoxLPEmm5MMnRVA
Maybe the two of you can hook up on Tinder?
ROTFLMAO!
Firewood?
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Siri Cruise
2024-12-13 20:03:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Skeeter
...
  | 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
  | and the Press
  | ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national
safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A.  As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger"  LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
You're turning me on with that sexy talk Chris.
<Loading Image...>
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Skeeter
2024-12-13 14:36:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Post by Skeeter
...
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
| ...
...
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
Skeeter only cares about 2A. As long as he can lubricate
his luger, the rest of the Bill of Rights is can be erased.
"Lubricate his Luger" LOL
Jerkin' his gherkin.
Chokin' th' chicken.
Waxing his carrot.
Oilin' th' ol' baseball glove.
Spankin' th' monkey.
We see where your mind is.
Governor Swill
2024-12-13 21:30:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Fill what's empty. Empty what's full. Scratch where it itches.
-- A. R. Longworth
LOL!

NP: The Carpenters - Hurting Each Other
--
Democrats: Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since 1828.
Bradley K. Sherman
2025-01-07 21:20:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
|
| President-elect Donald Trump is suing the Des Moines
| Register newspaper, along with its parent company and its
| former pollster, for "brazen election interference" over a
| poll published days before the 2024 presidential election.
| ...
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjg2n3xv7zo>

--bks
NoBody
2025-01-08 12:31:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
|
| President-elect Donald Trump is suing the Des Moines
| Register newspaper, along with its parent company and its
| former pollster, for "brazen election interference" over a
| poll published days before the 2024 presidential election.
| ...
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjg2n3xv7zo>
--bks
I could *swear* you libs were against election interference....


"In it, he accuses renowned pollster J. Ann Selzer of "brazen election
interference".

Her poll had suggested the president-elect would lose in Iowa by three
to four points. Other Iowa polls pointed to a different outcome and
many analysts were baffled that she would predict Trump would lose a
state he had won by more than eight points in 2020.

In the election less than a week later, Trump carried Iowa by 13
points.

"In my opinion, it was fraud and it was election interference," Trump
said during the Monday press conference. "
Siri Cruise
2025-01-08 14:10:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-08 14:21:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
On Planet Trump just taking a poll
of likely voters amounts to "election
interference".


Trump sues Iowa newspaper over election poll
claiming Harris’s lead
Dec 17 2024

Donald Trump has reportedly filed a lawsuit
against the Des Moines Register newspaper
and its pollster, J Ann Selzer, accusing
them of consumer fraud and "election
interference" over a poll from before the
election that showed Kamala Harris leading
Trump in Iowa.

The lawsuit reportedly seeks "accountability
for brazen election interference" they allege
was committed by the newspaper and Selzer over
its 2 November poll, that showed Harris ahead
of Trump by three percentage points in Iowa.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/17/trump-des-moines-register-
lawsuit
NoBody
2025-01-09 12:44:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?

I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-09 14:33:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
Yes.
Post by NoBody
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
You are as utterly clueless as always.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-10 12:31:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 06:33:02 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
Yes.
Post by NoBody
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
You are as utterly clueless as always.
You are completely drunk, as always.
JTEM
2025-01-10 18:11:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 06:33:02 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
Yes.
Post by NoBody
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
You are as utterly clueless as always.
You are completely drunk, as always.
That's what you call "civility," is it? You stinking little cunt.
pothead
2025-01-09 16:37:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
J Carlson
2025-01-09 17:31:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
He has no case.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-09 18:39:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by J Carlson
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
He has no case.
But the good part is by filing
a civil suit Trump can be ordered
by the court to sit down for a
sworn and taped deposition. And
he cannot hide behind the Fifth
Amendment this time........




Trump pleaded the fifth more than 400 times
in fraud deposition, video shows
Jan 31 2023
http://tinyurl.com/3xty43c3
Skeeter
2025-01-09 23:02:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by J Carlson
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
He has no case.
CBS gave him 15 million.
Josh Rosenbluth
2025-01-09 19:30:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
The case may not even get that far. Trump sued under the Iowa Consumer
Fraud Protection Act. In order to get to discovery, Trump will have to
convince the judge that he (as a consumer, which is only a natural
person in Iowa, not a campaign) has stated an actionable claim that he
personally had to spend money as a result of the poll. His filing only
mentions that his campaign had to spend money as a result of the poll.

But discovery or not, this is just classic Trump being a whining baby
who can't stand victory (let alone defeat).
NoBody
2025-01-10 12:33:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
The case may not even get that far. Trump sued under the Iowa Consumer
Fraud Protection Act. In order to get to discovery, Trump will have to
convince the judge that he (as a consumer, which is only a natural
person in Iowa, not a campaign) has stated an actionable claim that he
personally had to spend money as a result of the poll. His filing only
mentions that his campaign had to spend money as a result of the poll.
But discovery or not, this is just classic Trump being a whining baby
who can't stand victory (let alone defeat).
Laughter - at you.
Alan
2025-01-10 18:17:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
The case may not even get that far. Trump sued under the Iowa Consumer
Fraud Protection Act. In order to get to discovery, Trump will have to
convince the judge that he (as a consumer, which is only a natural
person in Iowa, not a campaign) has stated an actionable claim that he
personally had to spend money as a result of the poll. His filing only
mentions that his campaign had to spend money as a result of the poll.
But discovery or not, this is just classic Trump being a whining baby
who can't stand victory (let alone defeat).
Laughter - at you.
Josh wins the thread!

"How You Know You've Won A Thread With Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness"

It's when she starts blabbering her lame, stale stock phrases and words:

"pearl clutching"
"laughter" [used to be "<laughter.wav>" ]
"oh look..."
"pivot"
"word salad"
"evasion"
"runs away..."
"reading comprehension"
"change of topic" [when it's clearly on topic]
"oh the irony"
"opinion piece masquerading as news"
"You didn't answer the question" [when no question was posed]
"paywall"
"denial"

As soon as she writes one of these in reply, you know you've won the thread.

Josh wins again!
NoBody
2025-01-11 15:11:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by pothead
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
The case may not even get that far. Trump sued under the Iowa Consumer
Fraud Protection Act. In order to get to discovery, Trump will have to
convince the judge that he (as a consumer, which is only a natural
person in Iowa, not a campaign) has stated an actionable claim that he
personally had to spend money as a result of the poll. His filing only
mentions that his campaign had to spend money as a result of the poll.
But discovery or not, this is just classic Trump being a whining baby
who can't stand victory (let alone defeat).
Laughter - at you.
And Josh has fled as usual.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-09 20:38:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
First amendment includes the freedom to lie. This narrowly
restricted in commercial speech when lying is used for fraud. A
newspaper can lie openly or obscurely as long as this is not a
ploy to defraud real people of real money.

Even though the deleterious lies of Fox are rampant in your
bullshit, because is not getting money from you, they are not
restricted.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-10 12:36:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:38:09 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
First amendment includes the freedom to lie. This narrowly
restricted in commercial speech when lying is used for fraud. A
newspaper can lie openly or obscurely as long as this is not a
ploy to defraud real people of real money.
If there is sufficient evidence that she lied knowingly in order to
try to influence the election, that can be considered fraud in court.
Post by Siri Cruise
Even though the deleterious lies of Fox are rampant in your
bullshit, because is not getting money from you, they are not
restricted.
Funny how you leave out the rest of the media when you mumble about
lies. MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NYT et al have been caught outright
lying.
Alan
2025-01-10 18:17:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:38:09 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
First amendment includes the freedom to lie. This narrowly
restricted in commercial speech when lying is used for fraud. A
newspaper can lie openly or obscurely as long as this is not a
ploy to defraud real people of real money.
If there is sufficient evidence that she lied knowingly in order to
try to influence the election, that can be considered fraud in court.
Nope. It can only be considered fraud if someone bought merchandise or services
*from her*, based on false statements she made to the buyer. That didn't happen.
Post by NoBody
Post by Siri Cruise
Even though the deleterious lies of Fox are rampant in your
bullshit, because is not getting money from you, they are not
restricted.
Funny how you leave out the rest of the media when you mumble about
lies. MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NYT et al have been caught outright
lying.
No, that is bullshit. At worst, they have said things that displease you. They
have never lied. They also have never used "anonymous" sources. The fact the
sources are unknown *to you* does not make them anonymous.
NoBody
2025-01-11 15:12:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:38:09 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
First amendment includes the freedom to lie. This narrowly
restricted in commercial speech when lying is used for fraud. A
newspaper can lie openly or obscurely as long as this is not a
ploy to defraud real people of real money.
If there is sufficient evidence that she lied knowingly in order to
try to influence the election, that can be considered fraud in court.
Post by Siri Cruise
Even though the deleterious lies of Fox are rampant in your
bullshit, because is not getting money from you, they are not
restricted.
Funny how you leave out the rest of the media when you mumble about
lies. MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NYT et al have been caught outright
lying.
And the drunk is silent.
186282@ud0s4.net
2025-01-10 01:02:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
He may not have a great case - but after being
victimized by 'lawfare' that isn't the POINT.
He has to show he WILL fight whatever and put
serious assholes under the bright lights. The
court of public opinion is more useful here
than any court of law.

Get it now ?

As for Ms Pollster ... if you've got a big blob
of kinda subjective raw data in yer face, personal
biases WILL influence what conclusions you draw.
There may have been no CONSCIOUS intent to arrive
at the wrong conclusion and she could argue,
honestly, that this was how she saw it. The
court, MAYbe even the public, may see it her way.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-10 01:57:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
  He may not have a great case - but after being
  victimized by 'lawfare' that isn't the POINT.
  He has to show he WILL fight whatever and put
  serious assholes under the bright lights. The
  court of public opinion is more useful here
  than any court of law.
idjt drops his suits the day before he has to testify in discovery.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-10 12:31:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:37:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
I'm pretty sure the founding fathers are laughing at you.
Unless Trump can prove in a court of law that the pollster either knew,
or manipulated the data for partisan reasons, IMHO he has no case.
That will not be easy.
But interesting to see unfold.
pothead
2025-01-09 17:27:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented [sic] to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
No, and they don't do any of that.

The inaccurate Iowa poll was not "election interference." Only morons could
think it was.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-09 18:45:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented [sic] to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
No, and they don't do any of that.
The inaccurate Iowa poll was not "election interference." Only morons
could think it was.
Should all winning candidates
sue the polls showing they would
lose?

Did Truman sue?

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-nov-01-mn-38174-story.html

Did Kennedy sue?

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-drama-behind-president-kennedys-
1960-election-win

Did Carter sue?

https://www.historynet.com/gerald-fords-near-miracle-of-1976/
Siri Cruise
2025-01-09 20:47:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear*  you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented [sic] to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
No, and they don't do any of that.
The inaccurate Iowa poll was not "election interference." Only
morons could think it was.
Colonial press was outrageously partisan and lied, subverted, and
poropagandised. The founding fathers recognised this was valuable
in allowing issues to be fully discussed and explored. So they
protected speech and press. They expected citizens to take the
energy to sort through it.

You repeating your Gilded God's Los Angeles lies speaks to your
lassitude not the evils of the press.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Governor Swill
2025-01-10 06:06:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented [sic] to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
No, and they don't do any of that.
The inaccurate Iowa poll was not "election interference." Only morons could
think it was.
So, Trump is a moron, in your opinion?
Chris Ahlstrom
2025-01-10 11:35:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:10:22 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
I could*swear* you libs were against election interference....
I am not. We invented the free press to interfere, antagonise, and
hyperpartisanise elections.
You mean the free press was invented [sic] to lie, subvert, and
propagandize?
No, and they don't do any of that.
The inaccurate Iowa poll was not "election interference." Only morons could
think it was.
So, Trump is a moron, in your opinion?
<what Rex Tillerson said>
--
Real software engineers work from 9 to 5, because that is the way the job is
described in the formal spec. Working late would feel like using an
undocumented external procedure.
Alan
2025-01-08 20:31:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
|
| President-elect Donald Trump is suing the Des Moines
| Register newspaper, along with its parent company and its
| former pollster, for "brazen election interference" over a
| poll published days before the 2024 presidential election.
| ...
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjg2n3xv7zo>
--bks
I could *swear* you libs were against election interference
The poll did not constitute "election interference," and that's not what the
liar Trump is suing over.
Mitchell Holman
2024-12-13 03:00:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
|
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
|
| Trump 2.0 will feature more media subpoenas, communications
| seizures, whistleblower prosecutions, and legal threats
| against news outlets
| ...
<https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-war-pre
ss-media-leaks-1235202909/>
--bks
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
That is what Nixon said about "Deep Throat".
Skeeter
2024-12-13 14:35:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
|
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
|
| Trump 2.0 will feature more media subpoenas, communications
| seizures, whistleblower prosecutions, and legal threats
| against news outlets
| ...
<https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-war-pre
ss-media-leaks-1235202909/>
--bks
No first amendments rights taken. Leaker s are a national safety risk.
That is what Nixon said about "Deep Throat".
So?
NoBody
2024-12-13 12:38:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
|
| 'It'll Be Brutal': Inside Trump's Planned War on Leakers
| and the Press
|
| Trump 2.0 will feature more media subpoenas, communications
| seizures, whistleblower prosecutions, and legal threats
| against news outlets
| ...
<https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-war-press-media-leaks-1235202909/>
--bks
Well there's a new form of stupidity: we'll blur out the text until
you sign up for our newsletter.

Rollingstone? No thanks.
The Disappearing Karen Bass
2025-01-14 07:37:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
LONG BEACH, Calif. (KABC) -- After facing a backlash for declining to file charges against a suspect who allegedly sexually assaulted a woman in Long Beach, DA George Gascón says his office has now taken on the case.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office said Friday it has charged suspect Miguel Avila with felony assault with the intent to commit a forcible sex crime and misdemeanor sexual battery.

Loading Image...

Investigators have identified Avila as the man seen on camera Oct. 20 approaching a woman who was walking on a sidewalk in downtown Long Beach.

In surveillance video, the assailant unzips his pants and exposes his genitals as he walks up behind her, then lifts up her skirt and rubs against her. He then pushes her to the ground.

Loading Image...

Avila was arrested in the area a short time afterward.

Gascón's office initially declined to file a felony charge in the case, saying such a filing wasn't supported by the evidence.

That sent the matter to the Long Beach City Prosecutor's Office, which filed a misdemeanor case - but also urged the DA to take a second look.

Gascón said the city provided additional evidence that was not part of the original submission and his office decided to file the felony charge.

"The pursuit of justice requires careful scrutiny and a commitment to upholding the safety of our community. In light of new evidence, we have taken decisive action to ensure that those who commit serious sex crimes are held accountable," Gascón said. "I commend the victim for her bravery in coming forward. I want to emphasize that we will pursue this case with unwavering commitment. The accused will be held accountable for his actions."

The victim, Rebekah Pederson, told Eyewitness News earlier she was stunned by the DA's initial decision not to file a felony case, saying the video of her attack alone should have been considered sufficient evidence.

"It's mind blowing because nobody in their right mind thinks this is anything but attempted rape," Pederson said. "Nobody in their right mind. Not one person."

The DA is requesting bail of $150,000.

https://abc7.com/long-beach-sexual-assault-george-gascon-los-angeles-district-attorney-miguel-avila/14009794/
The Disappearing Karen Bass
2025-01-14 13:46:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Loading Image...
Melvin Aaron Johnson Jr. Photo courtesy the Long Beach Police Department.

Police say they’ve arrested a man on suspicion of sexually assaulting multiple girls and women in Long Beach, and detectives believe there may be more victims.

The 34-year-old suspect, Melvin Aaron Johnson Jr., is accused in a string of crimes that stretches back 10 years, the Long Beach Police Department said in a news release.

In the earliest crime, police allege he forcibly committed lewd acts on a child under 14 near Paramount Boulevard and South Street in April 2014.

Police also listed four crimes he’s accused of committing this year:

“Various sexual assaults, against a female adult” near Long Beach Boulevard and Wardlow Road in May
Sexual assault on a minor near Long Beach Boulevard and San Antonio Drive in July
Sexual assault against a woman near Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway in October
And possession of a firearm by a felon near Pacific Coast Highway and Pacific Avenue in October
Police said Johnson used a gun during several of the attacks.

“Additionally, Johnson is a person of interest in multiple additional sexual assault cases in Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department jurisdiction and the state of Nevada,” the Long Beach Police Department said.

Police said they arrested Johnson on Oct. 30. He was booked into jail on suspicion of forcible lewd act against a child under age 14, forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, two counts of sexual assault with intent to commit a felony, sexual battery for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual battery through restraint, sexual assault on a minor with intent to commit a felony, and possession of a firearm by a felon.

His bail was set at $3.5 million, police said.

Police asked anyone with information about Johnson or other unreported crimes to contact detectives at 562-570-7368.  Anonymous tips can be sent through Crime Stoppers.

https://lbpost.com/news/crime/suspected-rapist-arrested-after-string-of-sexual-assaults-against-women-girls-in-long-beach-police-say/
The Disappearing Karen Bass
2025-01-17 02:57:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
MEMPHIS, Tenn. — A man has been convicted of raping a child, aggravated sexual battery, and incest after sexually assaulting a child family member, according to the Shelby County District Attorney’s office.

After a three-day trial, 39-year-old Jose Ruelas was found guilty of the charges and could now face 25 to 58 years in jail.

Loading Image...

Jose Ruelas (SCSO)
In 2022, Ruelas was arrested after the victim’s mother filed a report stating he had been sexually abusing a child.

The victim revealed disturbing details during a recorded video about Ruelas including inappropriate touching and other sexual acts, and him showing her pornographic videos which lasted over a span of several years.

Ruelas confessed to the allegations and after 40 minutes of deliberation, a unanimous guilty verdict on all counts was returned by the jury.

He is scheduled for a sentencing hearing on October 28.

https://wreg.com/news/local/man-found-guilty-of-incest-raping-child-family-member/?ipid=promo-link-block1
186282@ud0s4.net
2025-01-17 05:17:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Never met any real 'hillbillies', have you ? :-)

The Disappearing Karen Bass
2025-01-17 02:55:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
MEMPHIS, Tenn. — A man was arrested this week after Memphis Police say he physically assaulted and raped a woman after going through her phone.

On August 25, Memphis Police responded to a forcible rape that occurred in the 200 block of Shady Court.

The victim said she allowed her friend Tamarcus Alexander to come to her residence to hang out. She said she and Alexander had gone out on several dates and talked about being in a relationship.

Loading Image...
Tamarcus Alexander. (SCSO)

While at the residence, Alexander became upset after going through the victim’s cell phone. He allegedly struck the victim in the head repeatedly in the head and stomach with his fist, knocking her unconscious.

Alexander allegedly proceeded to forcibly insert his penis into the victim against her will.

When she regained consciousness, she said Alexander continued to strike her and choke her while threatening to “kill” her.

She was able to get away from Alexander and eventually went to the hospital. She was admitted for two days suffering from a concussion, transient memory loss and severe headaches resulting from the incident.

While speaking to investigators, the victim provided a signed/typed statement and positively identified Alexander as the suspect in a six-picture line-up.

Alexander was arrested on Friday and charged with rape and aggravated assault.

https://wreg.com/news/man-accused-of-raping-woman-after-going-through-her-phone/
Loading...